Des notes réfléchies desquelles j'ai créé certains shaare plus récent

The books were once criticized similarly to AI now.

Saying no to AI is a luxury too. You have to be able to.

10 topics to consider while creating a file format.

Je suis auto-entrepreneur. Je veux changer mon adresse. C’est une immondice sans nom.

suite aux retours: https://lehollandaisvolant.net/?mode=links&id=20250521213749

Thus, the general expectation is that AI implies, at the very least, software that consistently and reliably outperforms a human expert at any task in any given field it claims to be proficient in.

Les LLM ne sont pas assez efficace sur des tâches spécifiques et consomment trop de ressources. En ce moment, il y a aussi le retour d'autres types d'algorithmes. Ces algorithmes peuvent être associés mais n'ont pas besoin de LLM.

En revanche, les SLM et les réseaux de neurones vont continuer à être utilisé, puisqu'ils ont des utilités spécifiques.

There are cycle in web development. For example, Server Rendering -> SPA -> MPA -> Server Rendering

When JS tools are written in other programming languages, it increases the barrier to contribute in these tools. The contributors need to know a second language.

A rewrite in another language is already a rewrite, which means things will be better built.

Node performance is often slow, but it works without cache... Let's try export NODE_COMPILE_CACHE=1 first.

Moreover JS is easily debuggable.

I fundamentally disagree with you. If a piece of technology allows for such mistakes, then it is at fault, not people

It has to be accessible but the software limiting the user
"So far, we’ve been lucky. When technologies try to protect you from yourself too much, they tend to die out in a few years"

In order to avoid user mistakes, what should the email client do?

Email is powerful beyond any other medium precisely because it does not try to wrest control from its users.

As always: frontend focus provide qualitative resources.

They have a partnership with Tonkotsu this time :)

it’s amusing to consider how complicated modern software systems are that the developers themselves don’t know everything about them

Against the experience of SPAs

Some things you have to consider with SPAs:

What happens when users refresh the page?
What happens when users click the back button?
What happens when users click the back button twice?
What happens when users click the back button twice, the forward button once, and then the back button again?
What happens when users try to open a link in a new tab?
What happens when users users copy the link from the address bar and send it to a friend?
Where does the page focus go when it navigates?

But SPAs make sense in some cases though.

This means AI will be given more responsibility for blocking "dangerous" websites. Increasingly, no one will know or care exactly why some websites are considered to be dangerous and others are not.

We’re stuck in a cycle where bad leaders break things for the sake of breaking them, and good leaders are too timid to stand up and do anything great. And nowhere is this more obvious than in how companies are forcing AI into everything—not because it makes things better, but because it makes their stock price look good.

We’re missing that now. The willingness to ignore the hype, ignore the noise, ignore the stock price, and focus on making something that is actually, undeniably great. And for the love of god, make damn sure the technology actually works or exists before marketing gets a hold of it.

Defining seniority is a very tough thing. Though in my opinion a lot of being a “senior” is in soft-skills, when it comes to the technical hard-skills, a lot comes down to Fingerspitzengefühl. The longer you work with a language, framework or codebase, the more you develop this kind of intuition of what the correct approach is. The gut feeling of “something feels off” slowly turns into a feeling of “this is what we should do”.

On one side, the website with the largest marketing budget ends up first, on the other side is to make websites to load fast.

These are both budgets that you cannot spend on making proper content. And so you see more and more unredacted, very crappy generated content on websites.

Regarding the comments along the lines of “is it really necessary to have politics involved in open-source projects?”, “can’t you be neutral?”, “what is this shit?”…

Yes, it’s necessary. YunoHost seeks to promote and emancipate everyone with regard to the management of their digital services and the hosting of their data. We aim to offer an alternative to Big Tech. These very same companies, most of them based in the US, have for the most part advocated and financed the return to power of the right-wing over there, with an openly liberticidal, anti-humanist, lgbtqia+phobic agenda, and did not hesitate to implement equally debatable policies in their softwares/platforms. We are firmly opposed to this.

Technology is not neutral, period. It is not a realm independent of physical reality. Many project did, do and will use their software/platform for political messages. Some altering your daily life in much pernicious way than a simple nyan cat on a loading screen during 1/365th of the year, indeed pushing for the very evil and controversial agenda of “not being an asshole to other human beings, especially minorities”: YunoHost is created by human beings, with their lives, their frailties, and their struggles. Other examples (in French) of this project’s positioning: 🇫🇷 Contre la nouvelle loi de surveillance (et les précédentes) and 📜 L'Union Européenne doit poursuivre le financement des logiciels libres!