173 private links
Another example of accessibility statement I have found so far
One good example of accessibility statement I have found so far
Open source: you all should use open source and private services because we’re not a corporation out to exploit you or your data.
Disabled users: hey, your registration edit field is not labeled so I can’t use my adaptive technology to register or even use your platform. Could you fix it, because, right now, the mainstream/corporate offering has taken accessibility more seriously and I’d rather use a tool/service that I won’t need to struggle with in order to operate.
Open source: what exactly do you expect? We can’t be expected to make things accessible for you, so you can either fork it yourself or just not use our software/services. We’re a small team and corporation has more money than we do so they can devote more time and effort to accessibility. You can always fork the project though and make accessibility yourself!
Disabled user: well, I can’t code, so it looks like I don’t have any other choice but to go back to using this corporate offering that at least took the time to label their registration field correctly and actually took my request more seriously. Oh well, maybe open source tools just aren’t for me.
capture d'écran du jeu avec une ourse rectangle en tenue de plage dans un fauteuil roulant, l'air en colère, devant une scout et une petite maisonnette de plage: Mais mon fauteuil n'a jamais été un frein pour moi. Ce sont les autres qui m'ont empêchée d'avancer.
The implicit association is not recognized by at least two assistive technologies
To be tested. I don't know if such app provides value or is a simple checklist that does not ensure accessibility.
Specific resources. They seems qualitative
Didn't read, but it can be useful someday
- Alternative characters are not always searchable
- Alternative characters are not accessible for everyone
Quelques commandes devraient pouvoir être plus accessible. Alsace Réseau Neutre en a réalisé une liste
Why we should avoid it? Because it can go wrong in so many way. The post describes different cases.
A HTML validator aiming to be better than the current W3C HTML validator.
There is a descriptive page: https://validator.w3.org/nu/about.html