Ce serait en grande partie dû à une meilleure détection des crawlers. Aussi, les moteurs de recherche fournissent directement des réponses, en se basant sur le contenu de Wikipédia.

Les crawlers sont plus agressifs et certaines ne respecte pas le robots.txt.

« cela signifie que les gens lisent les connaissances créées par les bénévoles de Wikimedia partout sur Internet, même s'ils ne visitent pas wikipedia.org. Ces connaissances créées par l'homme sont devenues encore plus importantes pour la diffusion d'informations fiables en ligne ».

Il y a en revanche un risque à long-terme

avec moins de visites sur Wikipédia, moins de bénévoles vont développer et enrichir le contenu, et moins de donateurs individuels vont soutenir ce travail ».

Les bots d'AI parcourent tout ce qu'ils peuvent de Wikipédia: les ressources, l'infrastructure, les bases de codes, comme des brutes.

We have started to work towards addressing these questions systemically, and have set a major focus on establishing sustainable ways for developers and reusers to access knowledge content in the Foundation’s upcoming fiscal year

Instead of trying to ascertain the truth, editors assessed the credibility of sources, looking to signals like whether a publication had a fact-checking department, got cited by other reputable sources, and issued corrections when it got things wrong.

Wikipedia’s dispute resolution system does not actually resolve disputes. In fact, it seems to facilitate them continuing forever.

Wikipedia is a mirror of the world’s biases, not the source of them. We can’t write articles about what you don’t cover.

As volunteers, editors work on topics they think are important, and the encyclopedia’s emphases and omissions reflect their demographics.

Crucially, if you think something is wrong on Wikipedia, you can fix it yourself, though it will require making a case based on verifiability rather than ideological “balance.”

That is, Wikipedia’s first and best line of defense is to explain how Wikipedia works.

There are articles listed as "Vital"

Ed Martin a envoyé une lettre à la fondation Wikimedia pour lui demander des comptes sur le fonctionnement de l’encyclopédie la plus utilisée au monde.

Le procurer dénonce la manipulation d'informations sur la plateforme, composé principalement de ressortissants étrangers, ce qui nuit aux intérêts des contribuables américains.

Tout est une page. Tout le monde peut modifier toutes les pages, enfin plus maintenant.

The problem with GenAI in Wikipedia from a workshop:
"The problem is, low-quality content used looked like low-quality content, but now, it looks like high-quality content. The problem is more damaging in smaller editions, since there are fewer editors to catch things,

Find reliable source(s) to a Wikipedia citation

1. Young editors often started editing Wikipedia as teenagers. Their curiosity towards the platform is sometimes triggered by school, in which they heard that Wikipedia is an unreliable source.
2. The editors are less active on social media. A portion have a gaming as hobby but Wikipedia editing replaced online gaming for many.
3. Intrinsic motivations is the key. They learn from the talk page structure and collaboration. They do name by heart that they want to contribute to a world with free, accessible and reliable knowledge.
4. All young people, editors or non-editors, indicate that they do need to feel sufficiently qualified to contribute.
5. Some young people are only interested in the technical aspect of the encyclopedia, while others mainly want to (learn to) write. Some are interested in technical aspects, and others want to write encyclopaedic content.

Young people attract other young people. We want to strengthen the existing group of young active editors to attract new young editors.

Report summary

Wikifunctions will use wasm and rust

le cabinet de Patrick Hetzel a essayé de supprimer les passages de sa page Wikipédia.

Par exemple: "De plus, il a partagé en 2020 l'infox selon laquelle des euthanasies de personnes malades du Codiv-19 seraient pratiquées illégalement dans des hôpitaux français par utilisation du Clonazépam [1]"

Aussi

La collaboratrice du ministre reproche quand même à Libération [...] d'avoir « publié un article sans demander l’avis du ministre ».

Narmol.

Traduire cet article en fr