The values of HTML are not exactly the ones of HTML first.
https://html-first.com/

The author recommends to include instead:

• HTML that is actual HTML, i.e., that is valid (common sense, until you start checking)
• HTML that makes full use of HTML features, i.e., that’s not XHTML–HTML
• HTML that is used according to purpose (aka semantic HTML)
• HTML that is accessible

#futurBilletDeBlog
#idea #browserExtension a view source with automatic indentation

Programmers want to write fast apps. But the market doesn’t care.

And the list goes on for th rest of the characteristics: reliability, lightweight, etc...

Programmers have power though.

Ce qu'ils créent est génial ! Un don est bien efficace.
C'est par là pour débloquer officiellement les fonds d'écran https://framasoft.org/fr/#support

Des retours du service numérique Flus, developpé à partir de FreshRSS

The butterflies are often represented dead instead of alive.

Trusted types are interesting indeed. They won't fit all cases though: what happens if I want to insert HTML? These are cases though, and the majority could use these.

1. Pornopulence
2. Protopie
3. Méta-modernisme
4. Croivance
5. Circlusion
6. Bombes à carbone
7. Littérature cosy
8. Long-termisme
9. Désinfluence
10. Pétromasculinité

It states that every method should either be a command that performs an action, or a query that returns data to the caller, but not both.

More formally, methods should return a value only if they are referentially transparent and hence possess no side effects.

Even in single-threaded programs, it is sometimes arguably significantly more convenient to have a method that is a combined query and command. Martin Fowler cites the pop() method of a stack as an example.

A blog hosted on Chris Siebenmann::CSpace with a wiki

Hey! My name is Simone Silvestroni. This is the personal website where I document thoughts, opinions, and how I work with technology to translate ideas into an enjoyable experience.

I am a…

• remote-first,
• freelance,
• full-stack (what do these labels even mean anymore?)
• developer
• at it professionally since 2017, and,
• as a hobbyist since 2008 (it’s been a while huh?)

I’m currently working with an independent review platform for education technology products worldwide.