Past a URL and retrieves some information about it.

First: check if the url is "safe"

A mission to accomplish: Working with the guidelines established by the manifesto and the social etiquette to progressively transform the culture of the internet and beyond.

There are three commitments to it:

• The commitment to social responsibility and partisanship
• The commitment to collective well-being and personal growth
• The commitment to rehumanizing social relations and reversing the process of social alienation

Old school GIFs put on website of the 2000

The headlines of the content picture well what content is in this post:

• The web used to be weirder
• Animated GIFs (WordArt)
• Music
• Cursor trails
• Webrings
• Guestbooks

1. The majority of your users don't have access needs
2. Accessibility is optional
3. Access needs come from permanent disabilities
4. Accessibility is a barrier to good design
5. Accessibility is hard to implement
6. React apps are inherently inaccessible
   7 Automated testing will catch all accessibility problems

To my surprise they didn’t use skip links when they were presented one. [...] They didn’t understand the purpose of these links.

He explained that when he clicks on a link, for instance to an interesting article about skip links, he expects the first thing he encounters to be the article itself.

Instead of a "Skip to content", a "Skip to navigation" could be better.

It's an initiative for knowing the people behind a website. It's a TXT file that contains information about the different people who have contributed to building the website.

A txt file is simple and fast to create and can be embedded easily with a <link type="text/plain" rel="author" href="./humans.txt">

It completes robots.txt or security.txt

This project looks interesting.

• No VDOM
• Rust syntax
• CSS scoping
• Routing & SSR & SSG
• Tauri support
• Htmx integration

A website that embraces Brutalist Web Design is raw in its focus on content, and prioritization of the website visitor.

A website is about giving visitors content to enjoy and ways to interact with you.

Guidelines:

• Content is readable on all reasonable screens and devices.
• Only hyperlinks and buttons respond to clicks.
• Hyperlinks are underlined and buttons look like buttons.
• The back button works as expected.
• View content by scrolling.
• Decoration when needed and no unrelated content.
• Performance is a feature.

The only limitation of brutalist web design is that it is designed for content and not interactions. So this design method does not fit dashboards of real-time data for example. Am I missing something here?

I appreciate the guidelines that can be reused on every usable and accessible website or applications.

A quickstart tip:

Start with left-aligned black text on a white background, and to apply styling only to solve a specific problem

and more tips:

• Understand the semantic meaning of HTML elements.
• Learn about typography.
• Try designing for a small screen by default.
• Learn from designers about their choices and why they made them.
• When in doubt, do what Tron does: fight for the users.

Le premier lien web bleu tel qu'on le connais provient de

April 12, 1993 – Mosaic Version 0.13

Get people to start their own websites as easily as possible.

At the time of writing, it is a great work in progress.

As UI evolves, I think we will come one day with a UI library that can be customized entirely (hello white label design system).

Being able to test features on it should also be possible. It don't understand how all accessibility criteria can be tested though.

Le guide d'Orange contenant un certain nombre de ressources