Daily Shaarli

All links of one day in a single page.

June 9, 2026

Free SSL Certificates and SSL Tools - ZeroSSL

Another alternative to Let's Encrypt

Wikipédia, plus fiable qu’on ne le croit | Radio-Canada
Les oligarques de la mer — Bloom
Gabriele Svelto: "In the recent discussions around rsync I've seen …" - mas.to

TL;DR the take is argumented and ends with:

So don't get too worked up about an individual using LLMs, that's not what's undermining the very foundations of FOSS. It's a drivel-spewing idiot who's happily planning to sink another 100 billion $ on a probabilistic text generator. We're talking about people using money that could have solved several world-spanning problems - even profitted from doing so! - and still didn't. That's who we're talking about.

Subscription plans | Actalis.it

An European alternative with an ACME free plan

⁂ L. Rhodes

The harder a piece of code is to parse, the more you will tend to rely on LLM-based analysis and generation to maintain and build from it. Illegibility to humans is vendor lock-in. That's the business model.

The enclosure of the FOSS commons may seem like a programmer-specific problem, but it really affects everyone. Privacy-preserving apps like Signal, for example, serve a purpose precisely because they're open and can be audited. Take away that ability to verify the developer's claims by parsing the code, and all guarantees are lost. The more that AI vendors succeed in locking in the FOSS commons, the less transparency we'll have into what our software actually does.

It is 0% coincidence that these technologies are being pushed by some of the least transparent companies on the planet.

Good Enough
Souveraineté Numérique — Analyse de site

Trouve les dépendances américaines à partir d'une URL. Le site retourne un score de santé sur la souveraineté des technologies utilisées.

Let's Encrypt Subscriber Agreement - Version 1.7 of 04th June 2026

Let's Encrypt bans its usage to countries sanctioned by the USA to conform to the U.S. law. That's added page 3.

You are not a person or entity that is:
(a) located in, organized under the laws of, or ordinarily resident in any country or territory that is the target of comprehensive U.S. sanctions;
(b) a prohibited or restricted party under U.S. or other applicable sanctions and export control laws and regulations; or
(c) owned or controlled by or acting on behalf of anyone described in (a) or (b). You agree to use Let’s Encrypt Certificates and any services provided by or on behalf of ISRG in compliance with applicable U.S. export control and sanctions laws and regulations.

It's ironic and someone pointed it out: "Let's Encrypt’s mission is to create a more secure and privacy-respecting web, except for people residing in countries with the most need for a more secure and privacy-respecting web. Sure, that's great."

We need an European alternative. Search on web directories related to EU alternatives and you get https://european-alternatives.eu/alternative-to/lets-encrypt

That's why some are already migrating away https://souverain.ovh/certificat-ssl-souverainete-numerique-actalis/