An image fulgurator print on image or a custom view that is visible only to other cameras.

See https://juliusvonbismarck.com/bank/index.php/projects/image-fulgurator/2/

Google is upscaling videos on delivery. So creators get their videos modified. The user is not informed and can not consent to it.

That's why Peertube or other alternatives are important: whenever Youtube changes some behavior, we need to have the right to at least leave and use something else that better align with our needs.

Bon, AXE est donc une marque de merde

So because a website HTML/CSS is protected computer program: an ad blocker intervenes in the in-memory execution structures of it; it constitutes an unlawful reproduction and modification.

This was first reject; but a new ruling sent the case back.

There are many reasons, in addition to ad blocking, that users might want their browser or a browser extension to alter a webpage.

As per BGH’s ruling, Springer’s argument needs to be re-examined to determine if DOM, CSS, and bytecode count as a protected computer program.

Mozilla noted that the new proceedings could take up to a couple of years to reach a final conclusion. As the core issue is not settled, there is a future risk of extension developers to be held liable for financial losses.

Klarna entre autres.

Le simple fait d’avoir un site Web ou un projet numérique suffisait à attirer des dizaines de millions de dollars de financements. Le marché boursier, notamment le NASDAQ, a alors atteint des sommets. [...] Mais en mars 2000, le vent tourne. Les investisseurs se rendent compte que beaucoup de ces entreprises ne sont pas rentables, certaines n'ont même aucun produit fini.

On parle d'un schéma qui semble se répéter avec l'IA.

Torsten Sløk, éminent économiste en chef chez Apollo Global Management:

les principales entreprises du S&P 500 sont « plus surévaluées » que les grandes entreprises au plus fort de la bulle Internet à la fin des années 1990 et au début des années 2000