I have a different preferred starting point which is less descriptive but more operational: WebAssembly is a new fundamental abstraction boundary.

But WebAssembly is a new point in this space. Unlike the Linux ABI, there is no fixed set of syscalls: WebAssembly imports are named, typed, and without pre-defined meaning, more like the C ABI. Unlike the C ABI, WebAssembly modules have only the shared state that they are given; neither side has a license to access all of the memory in the “process”. And unlike HTTP, WebAssembly modules are “in the room” with their hosts: close enough that hosts can allow themselves the luxury of synchronous function calls, and to allow WebAssembly modules to synchronously call back into their hosts.

It ensures the expected meta tags (OG and others) are set as expected.

The New York Times with an article "Everyone wants your email address. Think twice before giving it. To read this article an email is needed.

Vs

A paper on Nature behind a paywall named "the growing inaccessibility of science".

The point is that owning the address where your audience finds you is important. It allows you to be mobile, nimble, and without attached strings. It helps you show off all the things and places you want folks to see because you can put all these URLs on your /feeds page. It’s user-friendly in more ways than one

Un service pour connaître les points de dépôts