So because a website HTML/CSS is protected computer program: an ad blocker intervenes in the in-memory execution structures of it; it constitutes an unlawful reproduction and modification.

This was first reject; but a new ruling sent the case back.

There are many reasons, in addition to ad blocking, that users might want their browser or a browser extension to alter a webpage.

As per BGH’s ruling, Springer’s argument needs to be re-examined to determine if DOM, CSS, and bytecode count as a protected computer program.

Mozilla noted that the new proceedings could take up to a couple of years to reach a final conclusion. As the core issue is not settled, there is a future risk of extension developers to be held liable for financial losses.

It's called holydays.

(via https://mastodon.social/@acb/114808879158762522)

Ah oui c'est une tradition d'accord

Wtf am I reading at

La Commission pourra faire appel de cette décision.

Buy coffee through SSH. The checkout is definitely too soon though.

Répondez aux trois questions suivantes. Les qualités rédactionnelles et de synthèse seront prises en compte pour la notation. Un plan matérialisé n'est pas exigé.
Question 1 : La Haute Autorité pour la transparence de la vie publique. (5 points)
Question 2 : Le wokisme. (7 points)
Question 3 : L’amende forfaitaire délictuelle. (8 points)

Oui l'URL est bien https://www.police-nationale.interieur.gouv.fr

Use emojis as html tags.

See how this could be easily implemented with links, <dialog> or <buttons> in HTML5. The web made progress.

Le trajet est possible sans la carte... c'est du foutage de gueule