It seems that many of the products Google actively encourage web authors to add to their sites are paradoxically the ones that have the worst impact on performance.

The amount of data they collect goes far beyond what is useful to the end user, and is undoubtedly a contributor to the huge proportion of “junk data” stored in datacentres worldwide.

I recently made the case for this at work while making improvements to the company website, and my manager admitted that they rarely look at the analytics.

It seems to be a cool web project to extend HTML to the backend.

• Interop project https://github.com/web-platform-tests/interop
• Open Web Docs through contributions to MDN https://openwebdocs.org/
• WebFC Community group https://www.w3.org/community/webdx/

Still competitions on the web, but without fragmentation.

We want to make it easier for developers to track the list of features that are widely available and those that are under development.

To contribute:

• WebDX Community Group
• Ideas on github repositories

Exactly the project I wanted to build: display URL informations and their names.

A simple project to get small web projects running

The project website is at https://kitten.small-web.org/

How to link webmentions.io messages, likeCount, replyCount and reportCount to a personal blog with a few JS lines.

Crazy how much MB of JS are needed

1. It's bloated with useless stuff for the users

AMP’s biggest advantage is the restrictions it draws on how much stuff you can cram into a single page.

As bullshit jobs exist, so do bullshit webpages

Adcatio shares links to other people sharing links :)

The authors think the url does not really matter anymore because

• they are not fully displayed in some browsers
• they need to be short and memorable to get people to it

So it does not need to contain a lot of information.

Some tricks the author uses and explains:

1. using <link rel="preload" as="ROLE" href="URL">` to download
2. lazy-loading the search index (and this feature) as it is not used widely, and costs bandwidth (1.8MB)
3. Reducing the cost of webfonts: shrinking the typeset of the font (especially for titles) + combining css files

The author reduced the page load from 11 seconds to 4 seconds with these.

There’s a standard way to make part of a page not visible until the user requests it: the

tag. You may have seen this on big code examples in some of my other posts.

I wanted to show the types of webpages that could be added to your website, making it feel fuller, more interactive, and substantial

Which WCAG criteria concerns the projet phase, component, device, usw...?

A similar community to the Yesterweb, small web, etc...

a project to excavate shut down, abandoned web ruins and restore them to surfable, visually accessible, searchable, remixable condition

somewhere between a library and a living museum, we're working on experimental new ways to close the gap between archival and visibility of the web that was lost

A solarpunk web is the goal of the cheap web.

Cheap is different from free, sleek, creep, deep and dark.

How to build a cheap web? KISS and sustainable. Some tools are listed, as well as examples in the "explore" part.