What if a mastodon reply get deleted? Does the webmention on the website owner also disappear?

public doesn't mean "do whatever you want and copy it forever"

Le post de l'association PURR suivant l'article https://elk.zone/firefish.asso-purr.eu.org/notes/9peh4cw9b9n0zfab

Interoperable messaging apps should not break privacy with the help of encryption.

We had four lawyers, three privacy experts, and two campaigners look at Microsoft's new Service Agreement, and none of our experts could tell if Microsoft plans on using your personal data – including audio, video, chat, and attachments from 130 products, including Office, Skype, Teams, and Xbox – to train its AI models.

• Subscribe to an RSS feed
• Start something online
• Make your online thing RSS friendly
• Learn to write / format in Markdown
• Publish something using a Creative Commons license
• Make a FOI / FOIA request
• Edit a Wikipedia article
• Map your neighborhood on OpenStreetMap
• Read an Open Access paper
• Check in with someone to see how they're doing

Watch The Internet's Own Boy https://archive.org/details/TheInternetsOwnBoyTheStoryOfAaronSwartz

Separating different activities online helps for privacy.

A source of thruth. It informs which account has the owner.

Les outils SimpleMobileTools se sont fait acheté par une entreprise opposée au RGPD :/

Si vous n’avez rien à cacher et que vous ne faites rien de répréhensible, vous devriez chiffrer vos communications.

En ne le faisant pas, vous soutenez la thèse que seuls ceux qui ont qqch à se reprocher utilisent ce genre d’outils. Vous concourrez à la criminalisation de leur utilisation. Vous légitimez le soupçon généralisé sur les utilisateurs.

Utilisateur que vous deviendrez peut-être un jour.

Even if this standard is not used for years, some ideas are interesting. How and which data is collected and used are pretty well standardized.

It can somehow interact with the GDPR.

L'association "Pour un RGPD respecté" est en cours de formation et va entrer en action. C'est une bonne nouvelle !

To meet the demands of the European Commission's Digital Markets Act—slated to be enforced in March 2024—Microsoft must make its apps easier to uninstall, its default settings easier to change, and its attempts at steering people toward its services easier to avoid.

It includes Bing, default apps, Edge, etc...

A framework to build applications with privacy, safety, and user experience in mind.

It is developed and released by the Cult of the Dead Cow. The core is written in Rust.

A related article on the topic: https://www.engadget.com/americas-original-hacking-supergroup-creates-a-free-framework-to-improve-app-security-190043865.html

the company announced today it’s not going ahead with the proposed API.

See the first question heading of https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2023/11/increasing-trust-for-embedded-media.html?m=1

À propos des chaînes sur Whatsapp

One of the most important unpublished revelations from the Snowden archive regards American semiconductor supplier Cavium. According to Appelbaum, the Snowden files list Cavium “as a successful SIGINT enabled CPUs vendor”.

😬

Advantages of apps over websites:

• Gobbling data: an app does not get its request blocked as a website does.
• Making money: This one applies more to indie developers than to big companies but I'm sure people are more willing to pay for an app than access to a website.
• people want app: Think about that for a second: people want to download an app to track deliveries of their white goods, something which most people order at most once a year.