197 private links
A negative impact of LLM on the curl project related by the author of curl.
AI needs to come with a human review, especially in security.
I'm sorry, did you forget the last 200 years of technological progress advancing productivity yet leading us to work even longer hours? If we want to work less, we need unions, not tech.
👍
This should happen and it happens: an AI that play minecraft. A demo provides the different actions the AI is capable of.
Effectivement, cela se tient avec la technologie Apple Silicon: si les processus units sont les plus efficients du marché, alors ils sont prometteurs pour faire tourner de l'IA.
Apple livrerait donc l'IA en local; là où Microsoft ou OpenAI passe par le cloud.
TL;DR they degrade illustrators work.
AI can be used by artists to augment their work and explore an exciting, new, creative frontier. But the vast majority of “AI art” I’ve seen is not that. It’s theft. You don’t have a right to “free” art, in the same way you don’t have a right to have your car fixed for free.
There is an on going race between the AI that catches up the latest technology innovation and the innovation that blocks AI to grow :)
In our case, the artists can use the Nightshade to make noise to the AI input.
More about this technique: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2310.13828.pdfttps://arxiv.org/pdf/2310.13828.pdf
Maybe some tools to remove these watermarks will be developed soon.
Malheureusement, le fatalisme, la paresse intellectuelle ou tout simplement l’ignorance font que les gens continuent de se servir de ces instruments [...]
Est-ce que ce sont les seules raisons?
Ok un générateur d'idées, cela arrive...
It could be more performant than the traditional tools
Une classification des modèles selon droite/gauche et autoritaire/libertaire.
Selon certaines affirmations, les modèles répondent bien différemment.
User-agent: GPTBot
Disallow: /
User-agent: ChatGPT-User
Disallow: /
Les travailleurs pauvres sont exploités au profit des grandes entreprises du numérique. Voici un autre exemple.
Why Wikipedia can not be written by AI for now, and its limits.
One thing is that AI needs human in order to get better. Another is AI can only know what is public on the Internet. At last its output is not fact-checked.