222 private links
The implicit association is not recognized by at least two assistive technologies
To be tested. I don't know if such app provides value or is a simple checklist that does not ensure accessibility.
Specific resources. They seems qualitative
Didn't read, but it can be useful someday
- Alternative characters are not always searchable
- Alternative characters are not accessible for everyone
Quelques commandes devraient pouvoir être plus accessible. Alsace Réseau Neutre en a réalisé une liste
Why we should avoid it? Because it can go wrong in so many way. The post describes different cases.
A HTML validator aiming to be better than the current W3C HTML validator.
There is a descriptive page: https://validator.w3.org/nu/about.html
I’m worried about the tabbing behaviour, rather than the syntax and name of CSS masonry - Piccalilli
The mansory layouts is broken for tabbing and keyboard accessibility
Nice resources about accessibility on the web
I find it difficult to answer the question “is [blank] accessible?” Because usually there’s like 10 levels of explanation required to actually answer the question.
Things like accessibility compliance, inclusive usability, accessibility for different people and needs, all affect the answer.
- Utiliser le camelcase
- Positionner ces hashtags à la fin de la publication pour éviter d’alourdir leur restitution par les lecteurs d’écran.
- Utiliser les accents afin que ces mots soient correctement lues
Les exemples données sont aussi en fichiers audio.
Accessibility issues is not only permanent but also temporary and situational.
Another font made for readability and accessibility.