337 private links
The big issue here is, Desktop browsers are irrelevant. Same for people that may read this is on Mastodon.
The vast majority of browser activity is coming from young people (12-25), which use their mobile device for browsing. And, believe it or not, these folks click way more content in a minute than I do.
Still, it would be nice to have 100% FF users on my blog, at least if they are using Linux. But even there it is 50/50.
More and more of the traffic comes from mobiles and the young are the majority of this browsing activity. It is different for companies though!
A simple StartPage built for custom needs
Trusted types are interesting indeed. They won't fit all cases though: what happens if I want to insert HTML? These are cases though, and the majority could use these.
I am also anxious about this situation
The browser uses the bfcache technique to handle back and forth in history.
Il semble qu'utiliser un seul onglet soit optimal. Ces différences restent petites.
uMatrix bloque les requêtes des autres noms de domaines par défaut. C'est à l'utilisateur de les autoriser manuellement. Cela évite des requêtes non-souhaités vers des scripts, iframes et publicités ciblées.
I disagree with most of its arguments, but in the same time I agree that browsers are so big complex systems.
A browser engine to render. It was started by the Mozilla foundation and it is now open-source and free to use 👍
Source code: https://github.com/servo/servo
We should all be very concerned if some websites are indeed implying that anything other than a Chromium-based browser is now obsolete. The prospect of an Internet that is only accessible with Chromium-based browsers should horrify everyone.
Indeed
The WPT Dashboard, wpt.fyi, displays results for the web-platform-tests, or WPT, which are a group of test suites for many web platform specifications.
If the web platform as a whole were an engineering project, it'd be crazy not to have a test suite that's run regularly. The goal of the WPT Dashboard is to promote viewing the web platform as one entity and to make identifying and fixing interoperability issues as easy as possible.
Feature available or not in your current browser
A browser comparator
... de
Some websites are broken because the version detected only supports 2 digit instead of 3 or an amount of digits...
Okay !
A text-based web browser in the terminal. It uses Firefox under the hood.
TL;DR;
all mainstream webbrowsers except Firefox are running on chromium
In the mean time every competitor that Google converts to Chromium strengthens their position and increases the influence they have over the future of web standards. Even today they can do pretty much everything they want to, but things can get even worse if they get to 95%+ of Chromium market share.
So Chromium is the new IE.
So Firefox is the currently the only "right" choice to make. More in the articles.
Today the browser [Firefox] is sleek, fast and resource-efficient.
Le mode lecture de firefox: Ctrl + Alt + r. Il évite tout bruit gênant sur la page: cookie banner, etc...
À noter qu'il y en a un caché pour Chrome: https://www.minitool.com/news/how-to-enable-use-reader-mode-in-chrome.html.
It is possible.
Neural Network would be a cross-browser interface to use hardware acceleration.
See the Application Use Cases on the draft for more
Une introduction en douceur sur le sujet.
Pour un extension plus complète, j'avais bricolé: https://github.com/johannchopin/gitmoji-browser-extension
Un site qui demande des permissions aux navigateurs. Pratique pour tester rapidement.
Dîtes que Chrome est plus rapide que Firefox, et les gens penseront que c'est bel et bien le cas !
Google follows the rule "embrace, extinguish and extinct" of Microsoft. Chromium features (bookmark synchronization, safe-browsing feature, search suggestion, spell-checking, etc..) are provided by Google and are not a part of Chromium; but Google has long provided API keys for ditributors of Chromium builds to use. But as of March 15, non-Chrome builds of Chromium would lose access to these APIs.
As response, many Linux distributions may remove the chromium package from their dependancies.
this move on Google's part is just highlighting a situation that has existed for years already: you might use Chromium as a way of avoiding proprietary software, but if you use Chromium with features like synchronization, that objective has not been met. [...] Similar to Android: there is a core built with free software, but getting its full functionality requires accepting layers of proprietary code on top of it.
Having the tabs of a webbrowser into the filesystem !
Seems to be a funny experiment for now.
This gives you a ton of power, because now you can apply all the existing tools on your computer that already know how to deal with files -- terminal commands, scripting languages, point-and-click explorers, etc -- and use them to control and communicate with your browser.
window.navigator.languages[0] gets the first language (locale) preferred by the browser; works well with toLocaleDateString 😀
Such as : aRandomDate.toLocaleDateString(window.navigator.languages[0])