Are CSS reset always needed?

CSS resets are based on three premises:

• There are differences in how user agents present web pages, that is, their default styles vary.
• These differences have an effect on the given website.
• The differences are important to be handled.

But there are developers that does not use these resets

• That there are sites and apps out there that do not use and that work fine without a CSS reset is pretty much never being talked about in the context of CSS resets.
• When we take the extreme positions of always and never needing a CSS reset, positions we observe in practice, then we end up with a contradiction. P & ¬P

I see one (quickfix) way: declare the content as image, then use an alt text for it.
This rely on user posting the message to do the work, among other things. I don't know how to solve it yet though.

It is not a must, but better with it!

Yes I agree too. Somewhat not on my nerves.

I have money and I have a URL, how do I send money to the publisher of that URL?

The Payment Request API is too technical.

Linking to payment methods in the page.

Podcasting 2.0 RSS has a <podcast:funding> tag.

Flattr but the solution is not so great.

Brave.

...

Maybe a <meta property="financial-support" content="https://...."

The comparisons are a nice reminder that we don’t have to take in what we put out.

I now feel reconciled that this is not a problem or a sign that we’re in the wrong line of work.

Un argumentaire en faveur des réseaux sociaux décentralisés.

UX and AI, but no single speaker addressed the training data sources, the energy requirements,

But never once did the question arise of whether it’s ethical to even use these tools.

One topic was expressed: the AI slop

There’s a quote by Finnish architect Eliel Saarinen that UX designers like repeating:

Always design a thing by considering it in its next larger context. A chair in a room, a room in a house, a house in an environment, an environment in a city plan.

As Molly White states:

There are no ethical uses of current large language models.

Similar to a gardener.

Play around with ideas, follow intersting threads and see where it goes.

When something start to make sense, a TODO list follows.

As for staying motivated during the build process, while I don't have anything prescriptive I did write a post on what works for me.

In short:

• Anchors (links) are for navigating within the current document (page) or to another one.
• The dedicated "submit" and "reset" buttons are for specific form actions.
• Regular buttons are for (JavaScript) actions.
• Links can be styled to look like buttons and vice versa.

Link for navigation.
Buttons for actions.

"Look and feel" can be adjusted in CSS anyway...

Facile à dire...

Should it become a standard layout?

Une argumentation suite au guide.

L’IA excelle dans l’automatisation des tâches fastidieuses et chronophages telles que la présentation des citations.

Mais il faut vérifier l'exactitude des sources bibliographiques.

ChatGPT peut vous aider à démarrer vos recherches

Toutes informations plus complexe que ce qui peut être trouvé sur un moteur de recherche doit toujours être recherché.

Mais n’oubliez pas : bien qu’il puisse vous orienter dans la bonne direction, ChatGPT ne remplace pas la lecture de sources primaires et d’articles évalués par des pairs. Et comme les modèles de langage peuvent générer des informations inexactes, vérifiez toujours vos faits.

and more.

+1

« Gneu gneu gneu les jeunes ils fuient la réalité dans les mondes virtuels ! çaymal ! »
Vous avez vu la gueule du monde réel ? Comment vous pouvez leur reprocher ça ?
Moi j'ai juste envie de plonger à corps perdu dans les tonnes de mondes virtuels qui m'attendent dans ma bibliothèque de jeux vidéos.
C'est toujours mieux que faire une dépression ou sombrer dans l'alcool.