About becoming vegetarians and vegan.

There’s a lot more I can say, but I’ve found the most powerful lever was moral consistency.

TILs (Today I Learned) are useless, have terrible signal-to-noise ratio, create FOMO.

True, but they are not meant to be the best raw material ever made. They are made to add some randomness in your feeds (or way your consume news or content). They are personal. They don't share or are structure as a lesson. Most of the TILs I read are on Mastodon, toots shared on the fly because someone learned something. The tag Today I Learned is missing, but it remains a TIL nonetheless.

TILs are a way to discover things. Why on earth do you need some random facts to spark your interest in something?

Good point.

There are other advantages to the TILs. They can be read on the fly, in public transportations. They don't need focus or immersion as a fiction book needs.

I think in between: a majority of TILs is undesirable, a few can be useful. A balance is healthy. It is sometimes convenient to put your concentration aside, and distract yourself while reading something short.

Anyways, there’s a real friction between great UX and great security, and I can appreciate a lot of the challenges and compromise required to strike a balance.

The UX is currently hard.

There is often websites that have "bad" UX as listed in the post. The majority starts to have the "better". The "best" does not exist yet.

About dependency churn: how can we have less dependency?

Sur l'élection aux États-Unis, de ses conséquences et de la tendance politique actuelle.

Consitent and reliable UIs are good.

Definitely. I'm a big fan of Signal. Works at least as well as WhatsApp. The only excuse I've heard for not switching is "But my friends only use WhatsApp."

Don't be part of the problem. Create your account.

Hear me out: Investing in places like public recreation centers, libraries and parks will probably do more to cure the loneliness epidemic than any technological invention.

How a webpage can work for everyone

Design systems are extremely powerful when it comes to quickly creating prototypes.

The author feelds a disconnect with web developers who knows only JS frameworks to build a website as SPA...

Different thoughts about how we handle faillible and infaillible functions

Similarly as in functional programming where functions and closures are „just values“, here results are „just values“. This opens up some new possibilities.

So how to handle infallible functions that returns an expected error (Can not divide by 0) and infaillible functions (that execute 1 + 2): there is no way to distinguish them with Result only... Or maybe Result<Result<T, InfallibleError> FallibleError>

Conclusion:

Honestly, I don’t know if there’s any. I just hope to illustrate some reasons why I personally don’t like the Ok-wrapping in as analytical way as possible. I hope we can at least learn to agree to disagree on this point and respect that each one has their reasons for the preferences.

Avec Musk qui influence les élections allemandes en poussant l’AfD, et qui reçoit Farage (sans doute pour le financer et influencer des prochaines élections anglaises ?), comment est-ce que certains doutent encore de l’utilité de sortir de son réseau ?

“oui mais il y a de la visibilité”, “ah mais j’y suis juste parce qu’il y a de l’argent à la clé”, “il faut lutter de l’intérieur” ? C’est des mauvaises raisons. Tu vas réclamer des colonnes dans Minute ? Tu achètes des pubs chez Valeurs Actuelles ? Tu envoies tes communiqués de presse à Radio Courtoisie ?

Non ?

Alors casse-toi de Twitter. Tu n’as rien à y faire. Ton asso n’a rien à y faire. Ton business n’a rien à y faire.

Every program has dependency, even C builds.

The real thing with toools like go, cargo and npm is they move that library management out of the distro’s domain and into the programmer’s.